About Us

2025 uS Executive Orders, DEI, and Employment: how In-house Lawyers can help the Business

Remind me, what’s an executive order?

Executive orders are instructions bought by the president of the United States that direct federal government agencies and officials to take particular actions. While they are not laws, they have the force of law and effect how existing laws are carried out or implemented.

Executive orders impact the firms of the executive branch and therefore do not need the approval of Congress. They should be within the president’s constitutional authority and might be challenged in court if considered unconstitutional.

Executive orders might be rescinded, overturned by future presidents, or challenged in court, and enforcement concerns can change during any administration.

The brand-new administration’s actions have far-reaching effects beyond executive orders. For more on mitigating danger, global organizations can take brand-new opportunities by remaining nimble.

Implications of the executive orders for DEI initiatives and employment in private-sector organizations

On Jan. 21, President Trump released «Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,» which reverses various previous executive orders and memoranda, including Executive Order 11246 (EO 11246) signed in 1965 by President Lyndon B. Johnson.

EO 11246 needed every federal government agreement to consist of a statement that the contractor will not discriminate versus any employee or applicant for employment based upon race, creed, color, or national origin.

Despite President Trump’s new executive order, the underlying federal anti-discrimination law stays unchanged for private-sector staff members.

However, the executive order signals that there may be altering enforcement top priorities in the brand-new administration. The order directs all federal agencies to «combat prohibited private-sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities.»

In December 2024, President-elect Trump tapped Harmeet K. Dhillon to lead the Justice Department’s civil rights workplace, indicating his record of «suing corporations who use ‘woke’ policies to discriminate versus their workers.»

In addition to withdrawing EO 11246, the Jan. 21 executive order instructs each company of the federal government to recognize «approximately 9 possible civic compliance examinations» of personal sector within 120 days of the order — by May 21, 2025.

The economic sector entities subject to these investigations consist of openly traded corporations, big nonprofits — consisting of bar associations — large foundations, and universities whose endowments exceed US$ 1 billion.

Organizations that may be targeted should ask:

— What is my company’s threat tolerance?

— How will employees respond to the business’s actions?

— How will customers and stakeholders respond?

What internal counsel should think of:

Assess any federal agreements and grants

— Determine if they consist of any terms or conditions connected to DEI that might contravene present laws and guidelines

Review your organization’s existing DEI policies to understand job your danger

— Get ready for increased analysis and potential civil compliance examinations

Document, file, file

— Hiring and recruitment procedures

— Performance assessments and promotion choices

— Training products and participation records

— Any changes to DEI policies

Implications for federal specialists

To name a few steps, the Jan. 21 Executive Order needs the heads of federal companies to include particular terms in every agreement or grant award:

— «A term needing the contractual counterparty or grant recipient to agree that its compliance in all respects with all suitable Federal anti-discrimination laws is material to the federal government’s payment decisions for purposes of section 3729( b)( 4) of title 31, United States Code»; and

— «A term needing such counterparty or recipient to accredit that it does not operate any programs promoting DEI that break any suitable Federal anti-discrimination laws.»

Section 3729 of title 31 of the United States Code is an arrangement of the US False Claims Act, a federal law that enforces civil charges on those who make false claims to the government in order to affect the payment or invoice of cash or property.

The accreditation requirement carries a possible risk of litigation for federal professionals under the False Claims Act. In-house attorneys at federal professionals therefore have a specific interest in ensuring their organization’s policies, treatments, practices, interactions and material, job are examined. Assess if changes are required to mitigate the risk of lawsuits.

Executive orders targeting prohibited immigration

President Trump’s initial flurry of executive orders consisted of numerous — such as the Jan. 20 executive order «Protecting the American People Against Invasion» — focused on limiting unlawful immigration and deporting illegal immigrants. The orders call for enforcement actions by federal companies versus unlawful immigration.

In-house lawyers must consider evaluating their company’s employment eligibility verification procedure. They might also want to consider whether the organization is prepared for reacting to an I-9 audit or a worksite enforcement action (or raid) by migration enforcement companies.

Sectors that may be particularly affected consist of agriculture, hospitality, and other industries such as building and construction. From 2020-2022, 42 percent of crop farmworkers held no work authorization, according to the US Department of Agriculture. The American Immigration Council approximates that more than one million undocumented immigrants operate in hospitality, representing 7.1 percent of the workforce.

In-house counsel have an essential role to play in establishing and making sure consistent application of the Form I-9 and E-Verify policies the federal government utilizes to carry out and enforce migration law, shares John W. Mazzeo, AGC, director of I-9 and E-Verify compliance for Vertical Screen, Inc., in a 2024 ACC Docket post.

Check out helpful checklists of considerations pertinent for job in-house legal representatives on the topic of I-9 audits and worksite enforcement actions.

If a company does not work together with a civil administrative warrant presented by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), there is a threat that the company might commence an I-9 audit if they felt a company was obstructing their need to arrest a non-citizen worker, or sometimes obtain a criminal warrant from a judge if actions support it.

Steps internal counsel must think about:

— Determine the number of staff members might possibly be affected

— Review your company’s employment eligibility verification procedure

— Ensure your organization’s procedure is documented and defensible

— Implement and enforce clear policies

— Monitor legal developments, including lawsuits and enforcement assistance

Mitigate threat, remain active, and seize brand-new opportunities

The current executive orders will significantly impact global organizations. Legal departments and in-house counsel will require to help their companies comprehend and adjust to changes, ensuring compliance or litigating when proper.

A lot of the brand-new administration’s decisions will play out over the coming months, consisting of new executive orders and legal challenges. The Docket will continue to keep an eye on advancements. Global internal attorneys must get ready for rapid developments associated with:

Trade and tariffs. On Feb. 1, President Trump bought the imposition of a 25-percent tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, and 10-percent additional tariffs on imports from China. The former 2 were both delayed by a month as the administration engages in negotiations. Meanwhile, China has actually begun its own vindictive procedures on US items. He had actually previously announced his intent to impose 25-percent intensifying tariffs on Colombia (an action that was ultimately not taken).

Technology and intellectual home. One of the president’s first actions was to rescind the previous administration’s AI executive order. The brand-new administration also extended a grace period for TikTok’s impending restriction, sending waves throughout the technology sector, both in the United States and abroad.

Energy, climate, and health. The president also withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement and the World Health Organization, putting an early focus on American energy independence and far from the previous administration’s global sustainability efforts.

Steps internal counsel ought to think about:

— Assess the effect of prospective tariff increases on supply chain and organization connection.

— Assess the organization’s dependence on social media platforms, such as for marketing functions, job and the potential needs to backup social networks data and possessions in case their chosen platform stops to be available.

— Consider how advancements in the new administration’s technique to ecological, sustainability and governance concerns might affect the company’s ESG strategy.

Disclaimer: The details in any resource in this website need to not be interpreted as legal suggestions or as a legal viewpoint on particular facts, and should not be thought about representing the views of its authors, its sponsors, and/or ACC. These resources are not planned as a definitive statement on the subject addressed. Rather, they are meant to function as a tool providing practical assistance and recommendations for the busy in-house practitioner and other readers.